Carl Hooper v Lockheed Martin
(January 2005)

McCranie Sistrunk Attorneys won a Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of Lockheed Martin dismissing Hooper’s claims of sexual harassment, sex discrimination, retaliation and intentional infliction of emotional distress in the case entitled Carl Hooper v. Lockheed Martin in the Eastern District of Louisiana. In January, 2005 the US Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court decision in our favor.